It needed a better solution for building and hosting web applications in Windows, so it could keep competing in the context of the dot.com bubble.It had failed in its embrace, extend and extinguish strategy against Java (which ended settling in a lawsuit), and it had now embarked on providing its own managed language alternative that could compete with Java.The turn of the millennium saw Microsoft with a few significant fronts opened: This gave developers of the Microsoft platform a much better way of building web applications than the previous mixture of classic ASP, ActiveX controls and VB6 DLLs. NET framework 1.0 alongside Visual Studio.NET, with ASP.NET Web Forms being a core part of the package. Enterprise developers who were used to create desktop applications were increasingly moving towards web applications, often deployed on corporate intranets. These were also the years when DHTML was promoted as the next big thing (before becoming obsolete by standardized DOM, JavaScript and CSS). Of course, browser standards were only a dream and techniques like JavaScript forking for multi-browser support were commonly promoted. Few anticipated that other browsers would implement the latter as the standard XMLHttpRequest API and that it will form the basis for what would be known as Asynchronous JavaScript and XML, or AJAX. In the era of XML, Microsoft wasnвЂ™t shy to push forward with IE in areas like XML data islands or the XMLHTTP ActiveX control. NET strategy, and is a core feature of ASP.NET?

Did I mention that XML Web Services represents the underpinning of Microsoft's. In the last several months, the industry has awakened to the promise of Web Services. XML was king, and the future was based around XML web services.ДЄs Rob Howard, Program Manager for ASP.NET at that time wrote: Microsoft released ASP.NET to the world as part of the 1.0 release of the.

Components of net framework